Chapter: 5

Fluoride Toxicity Studies in Mehsana District, North Gujarat

General

A number of studies by different workers had been undertaken to investigate the adverse effects of high fluoride in drinking water on health in the Mehsana district. To place the results of these studies in a proper perspective, a summary table giving fluoride content in drinking water in a few villages is presented below (Table 4).

Table-4: Fluoride content in drinking water in a few villages in the district of Mehsana. (Source: RGNDWM survey data.)

Village Name

Fluoride content (ppm)

Village name

Fluoride content (ppm)

Village name

Fluoride content (ppm)

Gokharva

2.4

Litheda

9.9

Badarpur

4.0

Pinpharpur

1.5

Upera

5.9

Sarna

2.0

Kholwada

8.9

Khayasadu

1.6

Mirzapur

1.58

Thakrasan

3.6

Madhasana

2.8

 

 

Out of total of 1089 villages, 441 are reported to have more than permissible level (>1.5 ppm) of fluoride. A complete table giving recent data on fluoride concentration on all the 441 fluoride affected villages of Mehsana is given in Appendix 1. A summary table highlighting the extent of fluoride affected population is presented in Table 5. Out of 22 lakh total population of Mehsana District, 8.16 lakh (i.e., 39.8%) people consume the water with high fluoride concentration. According to the survey carried out by the Department of Health, cases of dental and skeletal fluorosis are reported in 236 villages. It is also noticed from this table that the average rate of water table decline was about 3m/yr during the period 1981 to 1989. This trend has only exacerbated in recent years.

For the sake of completeness we also give in Table 6a the summary status of water quality in Gujarat in terms of fluorides, nitrates and salinity. In

Table 6b are presented the minimum and maximum values of the above parameters, observed in excess of the ICMR permissible standards for drinking water. National and international standards of drinking water quality are presented in Table 7.

A survey was conducted in eighteen fluoride endemic villages in Mehsana district of north Gujarat (Chinoy et al, 1992a). The individuals affected with fluorosis were examined for apparent mottled teeth and skeletal complications. Samples of urine and blood of these individuals along with drinking water were collected and compared with samples obtained from Ahmedabad city population. The analysis of water, urine and blood showed significantly high fluoride levels in individuals affected with fluorosis. Several other parameters indicative of metabolic functions were analysed which clearly indicated adverse effect of high fluoride ingestion.

Table-5: Fluoride affected talukas of Mehsana district, Gujarat state.

Taluka Name

Total
Villages

Affected
villages

% Population drinking high fluoride water

Groundwater depletion rate (m/yr)
(1981-1989)

Chanasma

110

62

55.6

--

Harij

39

33

82.0

2.78

Kadi

118

24

14.4

1.96

Kalol

68

1

1.5

2.77

Kheralu

167

93

57.4

2.16

Mehsana

109

1

0.3

3.57

Patan

140

86

58.0

6.12

Sami

98

59

55.6

1.52

Siddhpur

82

55

74.5

4.07

Vijapur

108

10

7.3

3.36

Visnagar

60

17

31.5

1.75

Total

1089

441

39.8

Average: 2.99

Table-6a: Status of water quality in Gujarat in terms of fluoride, nitrate and salinity.

Sr. No.

District

Total No. of villages surveyed

No. of villages having excess

% villages having excess

 

 

 

Fluoride

Nitrate

Salinity

Fluoride

Nitrate

Salinity

1.

Ahmedabad

786

199

12

88

25.31

1.53

11.2

2.

Junagadh

1071

77

11

51

7.19

1.03

4.76

3.

Rajkot

854

38

7

30

4.45

0.82

3.51

4.

Surendranagar

652

63

1

47

9.66

0.15

7.21

5.

Amreli

623

80

58

10

12.84

10.91

1.61

6.

Bhavnagar

919

109

109

29

11.86

11.86

31.56

7.

Jamnagar

693

25

23

47

3.61

3.32

6.78

8.

Gnadhinagar

98

21

1

Nil

21.43

1.02

Nil

9.

Sabarkantha

1847

337

143

62

18.25

7.74

2.82

10.

Banaskantha

1556

418

58

74

26.86

3.73

4.76

11.

Bhuj

997

14

5

44

1.40

0.50

4.41

12.

Mehsana

1046

522

23

113

49.90

2.20

10.80

13.

Baroda

1651

293

50

65

17.75

3.03

3.94

14.

Kheda

973

220

85

150

22.61

8.74

15.42

15.

Bharuch

1123

33

42

108

2.94

3.74

9.62

16.

Surat

1190

27

26

42

2.27

2.18

3.53

17.

Panchmahals

1895

336

114

56

17.73

6.02

2.96

18.

Valsad

826

14

6

42

1.69

0.73

5.08

19.

Dangs

311

Nil

1

Nil

Nil

0.32

Nil

 

Total

19111

2826

785

1048

14.79

4.11

5.48

Source: Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GWSSB)

 

Table-6b: Status of water quality in Gujarat in terms of fluoride, nitrate and salinity -
minimum and maximum values observed in excess of ICMR permissible standards.

Sr. No

District

Fluoride (mg/l)

Nitrate (mg/l)

Salinity, TDS (mg/l)

 

 

Min.

Max.

Min.

Max.

Min.

Max.

1.

Ahmedabad

1.65

6.90

122

587

2,012

8,586

2.

Junagadh

1.56

4.86

Nil

Nil

2,020

6,096

3.

Rajkot

1.58

4.10

142

177

2,016

25,800

4.

Surendranagar

1.60

10.0

106

333

2,012

20,170

5.

Amreli

1.60

5.50

103

239

2,060

8,628

6.

Bhavnagar

1.60

7.60

106

257

2,012

4,142

7.

Jamnagar

1.54

1.96

103

354

2,016

89,510

8.

Gandhinagar

2.05

2.36

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

9.

Sabarkantha

1.60

8.90

102

780

2,052

7,138

10.

Banaskantha

1.53

10.73

102

270

2,026

8,274

11.

Kachchh

2.0

2.80

142

177

2,030

13,3266

12.

Mehsana

1.52

6.95

106

532

2,024

29,676

13.

Baroda

1.51

9.24

103

306

2,002

24,990

14.

Kheda

1.56

4.68

105

354

2,006

13,200

15.

Bharuch

1.59

5.30

114

197

2,100

54,182

16.

Surat

2.10

3.55

104

246

2,020

6,640

17.

Panchmahals

1.54

12.9

106

890

2,010

10,060

18.

Valsad

1.56

1.64

Nil

Nil

2,058

10,840

19.

Dangs

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Table-7: National and international standards of quality of drinking water supplies.

 

 

International Standards
WHO - 1971

I.C.M.R. New Delhi
1975 Second Edition

ISI 10500 1983

NDWM, DRD
Govt. of India

IS 10500 - 1991

Sr. No.

Parameters

Highest Desirable limit

Maximum permissible limit

Highest Desirable limit

Maximum permissible limit

Highest Desirable limit

Maximum permissible limit

Highest Desirable limit

Maximum permissible limit

Desirable limit

Maximum permissible limit

1.

Colour

5 PCU

50 PCU

5 PCU

25 PCU

10 HU

50 HU

5 HU

25 HU

5 HU

25 HU

2.

Taste and
Odour

UO

UO

UO

UO

UO

UO

UO

UO

UO

UO

3.

Turbidity

5 JTU

25 JTU

5 JTU

25 JTU

10 NTU

25 NTU

5 JTU

25 JTU

5 NTU

10 NTU

4.

TDS.(mg/l)

500

1,500

500

3,000

500

3,000

500

1,500

500

2,000

5.

pH

7.0 - 8.5

6.5 - 9.2

7.0 - 8.5

6.5 - 9.2

6.5 - 8.5

9.2

7.0 - 8.5

6.5 - 9.0

6.5 - 8.5

6.5 - 8.5

6.

Hardness (CaCO3, mg/I)

100

500

300

600

300

600

300

600

300

600

7.

Calcium (Ca, mg/l)

75

200

75

200

75

200

75

200

75

200

8.

Magnesium (Mg, mg/l)

30

150

50

100

30

100

50

100

-

-

9.

Chloride (Cl, mg/l)

200

600

200

1,000

250

1,000

200

1,000

250

1,000

10.

Sulphate (SO4, mg/l)

200

400

200

400

150

400

200

400

200

400

11.

Nitrate (NO3, mg/l)

45

-

20

100

45

45

45

100

45

100

12.

Fluoride
(F, mg/l)

0.7

1.0

1.0

1.5

0.6 - 1.2

1.5

1.0

1.5

1.0

1.5

13.

Iron
(Fe, mg/l)

0.1

1.0

0.1

1.0

0.3

1.0

0.1

1.0

0.3

1.0

14.

Manganese
(Mn mg/l)

0.05

0.5

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.3

Notes: PCU = Platinum Cobalt scale Unit. HU = Hazen Unit. JTU = Jackson Turbidity Unit. NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Unit. UO = Unobjectionable

Fluoride toxicity on body fluids and metabolic indicators

The data of another study by Chinoy et al (1994) revealed that the fluoride content in serum of fluorotic population from endemic area of Mehsana was higher and haemoglobin content lower as compared to control population of Ahmedabad city. The serum cholesterol levels in affected individuals were not altered indicating that cholesterol metabolism was not affected. Serum transaminases (SGOT and SGPT) were significantly enhanced indicating alterations in liver function. The decline in serum protein levels but elevation in Na+, K+ might affect electrolyte balance and kidney function, contributing towards loss of water from the body and consequent reduction in body weight. These and a few other results on body fluids and metabolic function indicators are presented in Table 8.

Table-8: Comparison of body fluids and metabolic function indicators between the fluorotic subjects from Mehsana and normal individuals from Ahmedabad city.

Region

No. of Subjects

Range

Mean ± S.D.

Serum (fluoride content in ppm)

Ahmedabad

41

0.03 - 1.10

0.170± 036

Mehsana

39

0.07 - 2.10

0.216± 0.060

Haemoglobin (in gm %)

Ahmedabad

10

10.9 - 14.2

13.01± 2.65

Mehsana

54

7.8 - 14.0

11.51± 0.13

Serum protein (mg/100 ml)

Ahmedabad

10

86.05 - 128.08

104.66± 2.37

Mehsana

20

69.90 - 110.20

91.82± 5.15

Serum cholesterol (mg/100 ml)

Ahmedabad

10

158.80 - 208.60

179.10± 13.17

Mehsana

17

64.00 - 241.09

157.05± 11.59

Table-8: Contd.

Serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT, Activity in mU/ml)

Ahmedabad

10

10.0 - 18.9

15.17± 0.87

Mehsana

19

18.0 - 60.1

36.63± 2.93

Serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT, Activity in mU/ml)

Ahmedabad

10

4.0 - 18.0

10.35± 1.17

Mehsana

19

9.6 - 40.4

21.32± 2.30

Serum Na+ (in ppm)

 

6

2900 - 3500

3158± 275.8

 

23

2800 - 7000

4577± 186.9

Serum K+ (in ppm)

Ahmedabad

 

160 - 250

197.5± 29.3

Mehsana

 

210-970

512.6± 7.9

 

Catecholamines (epinepherine)

Ahmedabad

10

168 - 260

222± 33.7

Mehsana

30

166-392.5

264± 27

Catecholamines (nor epinepherine)

Ahmedabad

10

78 - 120

96.24± 19.3

Mehsana

30

75 - 157.4

103± 12

Thyroid (T3)

Ahmedabad

10

0.7 - 2

 

Mehsana

10

0.3 - 1.5

 

Thyroid (T4)

Ahmedabad

10

5.4 - 13.5

 

Mehsana

10

9.4 - 11.5

 

Thyroid (TSH)

Ahmedabad

10

0.2 - 5

 

Mehsana

10

0.3 - 2

 

Serum sialic acid concentration (m g/ml)

Ahmedabad

25

180 - 236

200± 0.88

Mehsana

68

114 - 223

168± 4

Analysis of fluoride in serum and urine of fluorotic individuals revealed that fluoride in serum is higher in affected individuals as compared to control population of Ahmedabad city. As a consequence, the general body metabolism would be affected.

The haemoglobin content in fluorotic population showed no significant alterations as compared to control population. However, Macuch et al. (1973) reported low haemoglobin content in people exposed to fluoride and those living in the vicinity of fluoride containing fertiliser industries. Such diverse results call for detailed studies in this direction.

The activities of serum transaminases were enhanced which would indicate liver damage, and its altered function in fluorotic cases in Mehsana district.

In fluorotic individuals, the serum cholesterol concentrations were not affected. Therefore, it is evident that fluoride does not affect cholesterol metabolism and adrenogenesis in fluorotic individuals. The decrease in serum protein levels in fluorotic population would indicate its reduced metabolism, since fluoride is known to inhabit the protein synthesis. This would in turn alter the osmotic balance and probably also the immunoglobin titres.

The serum electrolyte concentration (Na+, K+) were also significantly increased. These changes would affect the osmotic and electrolyte balance of blood leading to probable water loss from the body and consequently a reduction in body and organ weights. (Chinoy and Seqeria 1889a & b).

A survey was conducted in eighteen fluoride endemic villages in Mehsana district of north Gujarat (Chinoy et al, 1992b). The individuals affected with fluorosis were examined for apparent mottled teeth and skeletal complications samples of urine and blood of these individuals along with drinking water were collected and compared with samples obtained from Ahmedabad city population. The serum Catecholamines were increased significantly which might be due to the stress caused by accumulated fluoride. These elevated Catecholamines would have a stimulatory effect on the sympathetic nervous system and thereby influence the hypothalamus-gonadal axis and result in marked changes in the reproductive functions. As a consequence of enhanced Catecholamines, the carbohydrate metabolism will also be affected. However, the urinary Catecholamines were not influenced by fluoride intake. Chinoy et al (1992b) have reported in their studies on effect of fluoride in 36 villages of Mehsana district, North Gujarat that, the concentration of sialic acid was decreased significantly (P<0.01) in the fluorotic population as compared to control population. Sialic acid concentration is a marker for detection of fluorosis. Sialic acid, a sialomucoprotein maintains equilibrium with its derivatives, the glycosaminoglycans in the serum. The latter are known to attach themselves to exogenous proteins of the plasma membrane by glycosidic and glucosidic bonds and thus play an important role in the interaction of hormone membrane bound receptor molecules. Hence, the above mentioned alterations in sialic acid might cause disturbance in hormone action at the largest cell in fluorotic cases.

The study also revealed that the serum cholesterol and testosterone levels of fluoride afflicted subjects are found to be unaffected. However, conversion of testosterone into its potent metabolite may be altered due to high fluoride. Also the hormone-receptor interaction and consequent target organ response may be impaired due to increase in prostaglandins, E2 and PGF2. Both these prostaglandin are known to manifest anti-androgen effects on the male reproductive system. Prevalence of infertility among residents of high fluoride endemic areas of Andhra Pradesh (Neelam et al, 1987) may have been caused by such effects of fluoride on reproductive systems.

Genotoxic effects of fluoride in Mehsana

Sister Chromatid Exchange (SCE) test was utilised in a study to investigate the Genotoxic effects of fluoride in Mehsana district by Sheth et al. (1994). The results from cultured human lymphocytes indicated a significant increase in the frequency of SCE in the fluoride afflicted populations compared to normal population. This means that chromosomal alterations and chromosome aberrations are higher than in normal persons due to excess fluoride in drinking water.

Chapter: 6